|
Frank Wood
Location: United States
|
posted: 11/01/2010 01:09 AM
Check out www.deplump.com. It is a new lossless compressor with fairly good performance.
 
|
|
CNK
Location: Australia
|
posted: 10/22/2010 11:53 PM
Great job with the website, I wish I could be bothered to do something like this.
I would like to inform you of the UltimateZip compression program (www.ultimatezip.com). I got an early version of this program over five years ago (guessing) on a free CD from a magazine and I have used it ever since due to the large number of files it supports (even more now I see). I have found that PKZip can compress better in Zip format but it would still be nice to know where it would stand on the charts. The newest version is 5.0 (should look up what mine is) and there is a Command Line version too.
|
|
Bulat
|
posted: 10/22/2010 11:42 PM
Toby, encrypted data can\'t be compressed......................................
|
|
JamesK
Location: United States
|
posted: 10/15/2010 04:04 AM
Could you add a column in one of the data sets to show which compression providers supports unix?
Thanks!
|
|
dayvid86
Location: France
|
posted: 10/08/2010 10:28 PM
Bonjour !
Je trouve le logiciel paq8px vraiment incroyable encore mieux que WinRK
Le résulta est carrément bluffent mais je trouve vraiment très dommage qu\'il ne supporte pas les multiple cœur vraiment très dommage, il faut améliorer absolument ceci
Je souhaite être tenue informer de vos précieuse avancées Merci a vous !
Hello !
I find software paq8px really incredible Even better than WinRK
Him(it,her) resulted is downright bluff But I find really very damage that it does not support(bear) multiple heart Really very damage, it is necessary absolutely to improve this
I wish to have to inform of your invaluable advanced(moved) Thank you has you!
|
|
Toby
Location: United States
|
posted: 09/23/2010 12:37 AM
I love the site. My eyes are opened now to the many archivers that perform better than my old standby 7zip. Well done.
Also, I\'ve been working with a lot of encrypted files recently, and was disappointed to find they don\'t compress much. Have you done any tests on encrypted files? Ordinarily, I think the best idea would be to compress first, and encrypt after, but I don\'t have that option.
|
|
Leo
Location: Argentina
|
posted: 09/16/2010 12:59 AM
Hello, I found your site very interesting, and I will recommend it to my friends. Thank you!
|
|
Matt Mahoney
Location: United States
|
posted: 09/07/2010 02:52 AM
Also, try exe_j1.cfg to compress .exe and .dll files. It implements a E8E9 filter.
 
|
|
tester
Location: Russian Federation
|
posted: 07/14/2010 03:36 PM
Here: http://mattmahoney.net/dc/#zpaq http://mattmahoney.net/dc/jpg_test2.zip http://mattmahoney.net/dc/bmp_j4.zip http://mattmahoney.net/dc/exe_j1.zip http://mattmahoney.net/dc/bwt_j3.zip http://mattmahoney.net/dc/bwt_slowmode1.zip
 
|
|
tester
Location: Russian Federation
|
posted: 07/14/2010 02:19 PM
ZPAQ 1.10 A10.jpg >> jpg_test2.cfg >> 716286 rafale.bmp >> bmp_j4.cfg >> 522029
 
|
|
guest
|
posted: 07/11/2010 12:16 PM
www.compressionratings.com is the best compression benchmark site: - Public data sets (software,games,text,audio...) Everybody can verify the results. - Separate benchmarks for each set and a summary. - Very large corpus (Not museum like). - UNLIMITED program options suggested by the authors themselves. - Author accepting suggestions from users and is improving the site and the corpus permanently. - Different result views with dynamic sorting (large listing, brief listing, pareto frontier, comparison tool,...) - Frequently updates
 
|
|
pl
Location: United Kingdom
|
posted: 07/09/2010 01:33 PM
Hi, why aren\'t the test files for MFC made available to the public?
Thanks for a great site though!
 
|
|
Fu
Location: China
|
posted: 07/05/2010 03:47 PM
Hi, since you are testing now. Please use the latest version of csc -- csc32a6
Here it is: http://encode.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=1341&d=1278337344
use: csc32a6 -m1/2/3 (-d64 by default) infile outfile csc32a6 infile extractedfile
 
|
|
Loderun
Location: Finland
|
posted: 07/01/2010 06:29 PM
But thing the temperature means? are joking, seems me what say!
 
|
|
Runking
Location: United States
|
posted: 06/29/2010 04:05 PM
The test update? in the next week-end?
 
|
|
encode
|
posted: 06/22/2010 06:10 PM
|
|
callmeace
Location: United Kingdom
|
posted: 06/20/2010 08:24 PM
Thanks for the reply cyan; I have noted those Etincelle links. Sorry to read that you got hit (you mean that you got hit by a car?) and I hope you recover and get well soon.
|
|
Cyan
Location: France
|
posted: 06/17/2010 05:25 PM
Hi Calmeace
Sorry to discover your message so late. It\'s even a miracle i found it, as I\'m not accustomed at using maximumcompression guestbook as a place for messages.
I would invite you to send your questions or requests either to Etincelle\'s thread here : http://phantasie.tonempire.net/pc-compression-f2/etincelle-fast-efficient-compression-x280-82mb-s-t102.htm#160 or more famous compression forum here : http://encode.ru/threads/579-Etincelle-new-compression/page3
To answer quickly your question : Etincelle is a just a (quick) compression algorithm. To be fully usable, it needs to be integrated into a real full-fledged archiver, such as FreeArc, 7zip, winzip, or any other.
These programs are much more usable, and on top of being able to process multiple files in a row, they also use some \"filters\", which prepare data before being compressed. Filters for Wav files are particularly effective. So for good compression of wav files, a wav filter is required (FreeArc and Nanzip are good examples for that).
Therefore, the current plan is to open-source Etincelle, so that any archiver (or any dedicated program) can use it. This way, your request for a program which compresses multiple Wav files at high speed with good compression ratio can be achieved.
This was pretty much on track when i got hit last month, which hampered my capability to program lately. I should be in better shape sometimes this summer, finishing the job (which was nearly completed anyway).
Regards
|
|
Bulat
|
posted: 06/04/2010 12:53 PM
please test nanozip 0.08! and it will be great if you will test all its modes (optionally publishing in official table only 3-5 best ones)
 
|
|
Fu Siyuan
Location: China
|
posted: 05/30/2010 12:14 AM
http://encode.dreamhosters.com/showthread.php?p=12067
Hi csc3.2 update to alpha4
parameters: csc32a4 -m1/2/3 -d## sourcefile outfile csc32a4 outfile sourcefile
d## means dictionary size ##,default -m2 -d64
 
|
|
Runking
Location: United States
|
posted: 05/26/2010 07:29 PM
Please test YZX archiver from ppmx.ru is very strong!
 
|
|
Bulat
|
posted: 05/25/2010 02:46 PM
i don\'t think that 7-zip 9.13 is any faster than 9.10
|
|
Gish
Location: United States
|
posted: 05/24/2010 03:03 PM
Could you please update the Multiple file compression test with the most recent release of 7-zip (9.13) and FreeArc (0.666) ? They both should offer significant improvement in compression speed.
Nice site!
 
|
|
Glenn Davis
Location: United States
|
posted: 05/23/2010 02:46 AM
Check out www.xtremecompression.com, a new website focusing on structured database compression. Xtreme\'s methods are for multidimensional data only; they don\'t compress text and they certainly won\'t work on Lena! But they do compress and decompress database data better and faster than any general-purpose methods -- just click on the \'Compare\' page to see comparisons on TPC-H, a common, standard benchmark.
BTW, I seem to be the only one on the planet working on this problem. There were two others, but since Oracle hired both of them recently, chances are you\'ll never again hear from either of them!
|
|
DAVID ALEJANDRO DIAZ CUEVAS
Location: Mexico
|
posted: 05/21/2010 08:40 PM
I HAVE DEVELOPED THE ULTIMATE COMPESSOR, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE IT WITH THE WORLD
 
|
|
Bulat
|
posted: 05/19/2010 10:39 PM
FreeArc 0.666 is just released. I expect it to be 1.5-2x more efficient that 0.60 due to new multithreaded compression (freearc 0.60 -mex1..4 modes now are -m1..4). Please benchmark it!
http://freearc.org/Download.aspx
 
|